<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reviews itemIdentifier="joystickspecialissue1pp1_2">
  <review>
    <reviewtitle>pointless</reviewtitle>
    <reviewbody>What a waste of words for two pages. The whole magazine was already available at https://archive.org/details/joystickhs01</reviewbody>
    <stars>1</stars>
    <reviewer>Bultro</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2021-03-16 21:17:53</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2021-03-16 21:17:53</createdate>
    <reviewer_itemname>@bultro</reviewer_itemname>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewtitle>Reply</reviewtitle>
    <reviewbody>@Bultro I disagree. Also, by your own logic, your comment is a waste of words. Some of the reasons that I think this is good:
(1) https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22download.abandonware.org%22 now has one result
(2) Info on abandonware.org can be gained
(3) Pages 1 and 2 are now tags (previously the artwork was not tagged) and one can search and find them by what they depict (previously not possible)
(4) If a non-knowledgeable user came across this JPG in another website they could search "joystick 2 magazines en 1" or "mensuel des jeux sur micro" and find this info on it https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22mensuel%20des%20jeux%20sur%20micro%22 https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22joystick%202%20magazines%20en%201%22

Metadata is important, and lots of data does not have metadata describing it. This specific data was not posted here before (i.e., no bit-identical file), but yes a very similar data was posted here before. However, before this item the data didn't have the significant amount of metadata that this item provides (e.g., tags/what the image depicts). There is lots of inaccessible knowledge when there is no or a lack of metadata of the data. In my account https://archive.org/details/@oddgrenadier?query=%22computer+chronicles%22 is an example of making knowledge more accessible.

So no this is not a waste of words, it is contribution to ontological clarity. If you mean I could have better spent my time focusing on more rare things or uploading data which hasn't been uploaded here before then maybe you are right. However, I still don't regret uploading this.</reviewbody>
    <stars>0</stars>
    <reviewer>OddGrenadier</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2021-06-24 06:18:20</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2021-06-24 06:18:20</createdate>
    <reviewer_itemname>@oddgrenadier</reviewer_itemname>
  </review>
  <info>
    <num_reviews>2</num_reviews>
    <avg_rating>1.00</avg_rating>
  </info>
</reviews>
